Wednesday, December 27, 2006
Chri$tma$
It's not the atheists that have degraded Christmas to its present commerciality, that was done by the good old Sunday School attending Christians who preach their religion on Sunday and leave it at the door of the church on the way out. Last I knew, the giving of gifts was supposed to represent the gifts the magi left the Christ child and, more importantly, the gifts that He gave us. But, in a day where we worship technology, money, power, influence and other such worldly things, giving gifts to others is simply a way to say "thanks," "good work," "I love you," or even "I gave you something so I want something in return." As long as someone out there is still giving toys anonymously to the family down the street or giving food, blankets, and clothes to the homeless we at least stand a chance of a comeback.
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
Me? Shallow?
Girls never go for guys that have any depth to them. These are the guys that get made fun of in gym class and end up banking a ton of money starting some internet company.
It's easy to know what shallow guys want and need. No one ever has to guess as to what I mean when I say, "Gee, Carla! You look really nice today." Since I am shallow that means only one thing and if you can't figure it out you are probably wondering if Microsoft is going to have your pension ready for you when it's time to retire.
Being shallow means I have no ulterior motives and girls can dig that. There's no need for mind games and wondering if I should call or what I'm supposed to say. It's so much easier! Dating should not be hard work and if it is, then I'm not doing it right.
Plus, shallow guys get the hottest chicks anyway! Remember back in high school? The hottest cheerleader dated the hottest, shallowest guy on the football team, not the captain of the physics club.
And when you get older, you don't have to worry, because your girl already knows you're going to ditch her for a younger, hotter girl anyway. Younger girls dig older, more experienced men, right? Especially if you shave your head and have a sexy voice. (That voice coach worked wonders on me!)
So please, don't think about it too hard. The choice should already be made up for you: being shallow is the only way to go.
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
Etymology
But is all language communication? Is all communication language? My answer to both is, "No." If I could choose somewhere in between yes and no, I would. I do think most language is communication and most communication is language. Yes, body language and tone of voice and other non-verbal and non-written elements can be factored into communication, but what good is body language if you don't know what they are saying?
Le français est la langue d'amour. Ma il francese viene da latino. O italiano e o espanhol originaram desta mesma linguagem. Así es con el portugués.
Language and communication have not only the power to unify but also to divide.
Monday, December 11, 2006
Augusto Pinochet
Of all Latin American countries, Chile is probably one of the most stable economically and - dare I say - politically. While it is true that many rallies and protests turn violent, I am not aware of any deaths or sever injuries in the recent past, unlike other regional protests. This could be due, in part, to the military and police training, where Pinochet began his political career.
Under Pinochet, the country began the move from privatization to a more capitalistic economy, including allowing foreign investors in. From this standpoint, one could argue that Pinochet brought the country out of the economic demise spurred by Allende's socialist program.
But, as in all stories, there is opposition. Pinochet may be more famous (or infamous) for allowing, sanctioning and possibly participating in murdering alleged enemies, not to mention torture, abuse, and exile imposed on others. All estimates of the number of victims are in the thousands, though no one is sure that an exact count will be known.
Controversies abounded during his life and in death it will continue. Was he a hero or a villain? Is it possible to be both? David killed Goliath and became king, but then he fell from grace by killing Uriah and lusting after Uriah's wife. It is hard to imagine, though, that one person can be capable of both extremes, so much good, and so much evil.
Thursday, December 07, 2006
Half Asleep
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
With a Little Help from the Climate
Sometime between the 15th and 19th centuries, the temperature in Europe, and potentially across the globe, was almost 1 degree celsius cooler than normal, which in turn made for some extremely harsh winters and colder, shorter summers. This colder climate made the trees grow slower, so that the space between the tree rings was smaller, thus making them more resonant in the violins (according to some).
This colder climate also killed much of the vineyards in Northern Europe, so instead of wine, they turned to their cereals and grains to make alcoholic beverages. As they emigrated to the United States, they brought their traditions along with them. Even today, more than 80% of the alcoholic beverages consumed in the USA is beer and hard liquor. Most of the wines are drunk on the coasts.
And finally, the Vikings who were renowned for their survival skills were killed off in Greenland (when they moved to Greenland, it really was green due to the Midieval Climate Optimum) because of the harsher winters and their lack of assuming the skills of the Inuits with whom they shared the frozen country.
It is interesting how the weather from hundreds of years ago has affected us even today, without us realizing it.
Tuesday, December 05, 2006
Capitalist Healthcare
In my Personal Aside, I talked of possible impending bad news. Implied was that my doctor had some news for me and it would either be great news or horrible news; however, the time period that I had to wait for the news was excruciatingly long. My test was on a Friday and I was told that I should have the results by Tuesday. Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday I called the doctor's office multiple times and they had neither received results, nor had they requested results. On Friday when I called, they informed me that the hospital that performed the test on me had no record of me being there the week before! Finally, I went to the hospital myself and got the test results.
I read the results, which were of a somewhat less than promising nature (I'm being sarcastic if you can't tell- the results were scary!). When dropping the results off at the doctor's office, they told me they had received them, but had forgotten to call me! Obviously, they don't get paid by letting me know my test results on a timely basis, but this is a life we are talking about! What if I had 48 hours to live? They had begun their reimbursement process, so what did they care? They wouldn't get their cash any sooner if they told me the test results on Monday or Friday or two years later.
The worst part is, on a follow-up test, the same thing happened agin. Where are we headed with this? Doctor's offices get their money, hospitals are only required to do bare minimum procedures for those who can't afford insurance...Shouldn't everyone be entitled to the same treatment? Government-run healthcare would alleivate part of this, but with all the bureaucracy and red tape, would timeliness be unaffected? Would medical advances slow or even stop because the inventors would not be as well compensated as they would have been under capitalism?
Where do we go from here? What improvements can we make without sacrificing what we've already got?
Thursday, November 30, 2006
Is he dead?
Off that topic, I was playing a video game the other day (yes, during my sabbatical) and in it, the narrator supposedly mentioned Sir James George Frazer's book 'The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion,' and then said, "[we] are overwhelmed by our very human need to weave a web of meaning where there may be none." A review by Time magazine found on Amazon.com's website, here, blasts Frazer for essentially saying only the stupid believe in a god and only the intelligent believe in science. Apparently he must have felt that religion and science cannot coexist.
He does have a point that everyone must consider, however, to be confident in their faith. Do you believe what you do because you have no proof otherwise? Is there no other rational explanation, so you simply attribute it to a higher being? If so, then I would venture that your faith and beliefs are shaky, at best. To be firmly rooted in your beliefs, in your faith, in your church, in your branch of study, you should have evidence to support your claim. To scientists, they require empirical evidence, while the proof of a higher being for those who believe may be something else.
Remember, the proof for which you seek is not for others but for you. You must obtain sufficient proof to convince yourself of the "truth," however you may define it. What anyone else thinks is irrelevant. You are on a quest for yourself, not others.
Monday, November 20, 2006
Personal Aside
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Profit & Loss
Monday, November 06, 2006
War in Iraq
With election day around the corner, it's impossible to avoid hearing the republicans bashing the democrats for bashing the republicans regarding the war in Iraq. The deomcrats feel we are wasting time, money, and - more importantly - lives fighting a seemingly unending war. A civil war is imminent and I don't know who would argue against it.
The republicans are somewhat in agreement, though they won't admit it. Their point is that the democrats don't have a plan to remediate what the republicans screwed up.
At first glance, pulling our troops out would seem like a great idea; however, we started this mess, so shouldn't we stick around to help clean it up?
It's been on odd war in the first place. The wholc world knows George W. was just looking for an excuse to go after Saddam and in the inaccurate intelligence (sort of an oxymoron, isn't it?) he found that excuse. That is not to say Sadaam should have stayed in power, but we should not justify our actions with a lie. The world is a much better place without Saddam in power, but are the lives of the Iraqis any better? How many of them have died innocently? When will the threat of civil war, or car bombings, of suicide bombers, of hunger, of death be reduced to levels lower than when Saddam's regime ruled?
Maybe overl human rights are better, arguably, but now what? No one seems to know what to do and in the meantime, hundreds of innocent people are dying.
Friday, November 03, 2006
Note to Self
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
Next Time Won't You Sing with Me
Monday, October 30, 2006
American Nationalism
Thursday, October 26, 2006
Natural Man
Tuesday, October 24, 2006
Kidney Stones
Kidney stones, also known as nephrolithiases, urolithiases or renal calculi, are solid accretions (crystals) of dissolved minerals in urine found inside the kidneys or ureters. They vary in size from as small as a grain of sand to as large as a golf ball. Kidney stones typically leave the body in the urine stream; if they grow relatively large before passing (on the order of millimeters), obstruction of a ureter and distention with urine can cause severe pain most commonly felt in the flank, lower abdomen and groin. Kidney stones are unrelated to gallstones.
Etiology
Conventional wisdom has held that consumption of too much calcium can aggravate the development of kidney stones, since the most common type of stone is calcium oxalate. However, strong evidence has accumulated demonstrating that low-calcium diets are associated with higher stone risk and vice-versa for the typical stone former.
Other examples of kidney stones include struvite (magnesium, ammonium and phosphate), uric acid, calcium phosphate, or cystine (found only in people suffering from cystinuria). The formation of struvite stones is associated with the presence of urea-splitting bacteria, most commonly Proteus mirabilis (also Klebsiella, Serratia, Providencia species) which can split urea into ammonia, resulting in favorable conditions for the formation of struvite. A lack of the protein calgranulin is blamed by some for the appearance of calcium oxalate stones.
Symptoms
Kidney stones are usually asymptomatic until they obstruct the flow of urine. Symptoms can include acute flank pain (renal colic), nausea and vomiting, restlessness, dull pain, hematuria, and possibly fever if infection is present. Acute renal colic is described as one of the worst types of pain that a patient can suffer. Note that the pain is generally due to the stone's presence in the ureter, and not—as is commonly believed—the urethra and lower genitals.
Some patients have no symptoms until their urine turns bloody—this may be the first symptom of a kidney stone. The amount of blood may not be sufficient to be seen, and thus the first warning can be microscopic hematuria, when red blood cells are found in the microscopic study of a urine sample, during a routine medical test.
Diagnosis & Investigation
Diagnosis is usually made on the basis of the location and severity of the pain, which is typically colic in nature (comes and goes in spasmodic waves). Radiological imaging is used to confirm the diagnosis and a number of other tests can be undertaken to help establish both the possible cause and consequences of the stone. Ultrasound imaging is also useful as it will give details about the presence of hydronephrosis (swelling of the kidney - suggesting the stone is blocking the outflow of urine). It will also show the 10% of stones that do not have enough calcium to be seen on x-rays (radiolucent stones).
The relatively dense calcium renders these stones radio-opaque and they can be detected by a traditional X-ray of the abdomen that includes Kidneys, Ureters and Bladder—KUB. This may be followed by an IVP (Intravenous Pyelogram; IntraVenous Urogram (IVU) is the same test by another name) which requires about 50ml of a special dye to be injected into the bloodstream that is excreted by the kidneys and by its density helps outline any stone on a repeated X-ray. These can also be detected by a Retrograde pyelogram where similar "dye" is injected directly into the ureteral opening in the bladder by a surgeon. Computed tomography (CT or CAT scan), a specialized X-ray, is considered the gold-standard diagnostic test for the detection of kidney stones, and in this setting does not require the use of intravenous contrast, which carries some risk in certain people (eg, allergy, kidney damage). All stones are detectable by CT except very rare stones composed of certain drug residues in urine.
Investigations typically carried out include:
• Microscopic study of urine, which may show proteins, red blood cells, pus cells, cellular casts and crystals.
• Culture of a urine sample to exclude urine infection (either as a differential cause of the patient's pain, or secondary to the presence of a stone)
• Blood tests: Full blood count for the presence of a raised white cell count (Neutrophilia) suggestive of infection, a check of renal function and if raised blood calcium blood levels (hypercalcaemia).
• 24 hour urine collection to measure total daily urinary calcium, oxalate and phosphate
Treatment
Stones less than 5 mm in size usually will pass spontaneously, however the majority of stones greater than 6 mm will require some form of intervention, especially so if the stone is stuck causing persistent obstruction and/or infection of the urinary tract. Management of pain from kidney stones varies from country to country and even from physician to physician, but may require intravenous medication (eg, narcotic or nonsteroidal antiinflammatories) in acute situations or similar classes of drugs may be effectve orally in an outpatient setting for less severe discomfort. In many cases non-invasive Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy may be used. Otherwise some form of invasive procedure is required; with approaches including ureteroscopic fragmentation (or simple basket extraction if feasible) using laser, ultrasonic or mechanical (pneumatic, shock-wave) forms of energy to fragment stones. percutaneous nephrolithotomy or open surgery may ultimately be necessary for large or complicated stones or stones which fail other less invasive attempts at treatment.
A single study in the USA, at the Mayo Clinic, has suggested that Lithotripsy may increase subsequent incidence of diabetes and hypertension, but it has not been felt warranted to change clinical practice at the clinic.
Secondary Prevention
Preventive strategies include dietary modifications and sometimes also taking drugs with the goal of reducing excretory load on the kidneys:
• Drinking enough water to make 2 to 2.5 litres of urine per day.
•A diet low in protein, nitrogen and sodium intake.
• Restriction of oxalate-rich foods and maintaining an adequate intake of dietary calcium is recommended. There is equivocal evidence that calcium supplements increase the risk of stone formation, though calcium citrate appears to carries the lowest, if any, risk
• Taking drugs such as thiazides, potassium citrate, magnesium citrate and allopurinol depending on the cause of stone formation.
• Depending on the stone formation disease, vitamin B-6 and orthophosphate supplements (such as IP-6) may be helpful, although these treatments are generally reserved for those with Primary Hyperoxaluria. Cellulose supplements have also shown potential for reducing kidney stones caused by certain conditions, although, again, not much research has been completed on this treatment.
Certain foods may increase the risk of stones: spinach, rhubarb, chocolate, peanuts, cocoa, tomato juice, grapefruit juice, apple juice, soda (acidic and contains phosphorus), all types of tea, and berries (high levels of oxalate). In the United States, the South has the highest incidence of kidney stones, a region where sweet tea consumption is very common. Other drinks are associated with decreased risk of stones, including wine, lemonade and orange juice, the latter two of which are rich in citrate, a stone inhibitor.
A note on alcohol: Although it has been claimed that the diuretic effects of alcohol can result in dehydration, which is important for kidney stones sufferers to avoid, there are no conclusive data demonstrating any cause and effect regarding kidney stones. However, some have theorized that frequent and binge drinkers create situations that set up dehydration, (alcohol consumption, hangovers, and poor sleep and stress habits). In this view, it is not the alcohol that creates a kidney stone but it is the alcohol drinker's associated behavior that sets it up. [citation needed]
One of the recognized medical therapies for prevention of stones is thiazides, a class of drugs usually thought of as diuretic. These drugs prevent stones through an effect independent of their diuretic properties: they reduce urinary calcium excretion. Nonetheless, their diuretic property does not preclude their efficacy as stone preventive. Though caffeine does acutely increase urinary calcium excretion, coffee has a high oxalate content which has been known to cause stones in some patients and should be used sparingly. Sodium restiction is necessary for clinical effect, as sodium excess promotes calcium excretion. In addition, the effect probably fades after two years or so of therapy (tachyphylaxis).
A high protein diet might be partially to blame. Protein from meat and other animal products is broken down into acids. The most available alkaline base to balance the acid from protein is calcium carbonates and phosphates from the bones (buffering). The kidney filters the liberated calcium which may then form insoluble crystals (ie, stones)in urine with available oxalate (partly from metabolic processes, partly from diet) or phosphate ions depending on conditions. One of the simplest fixes in addition to increased fluid intake is to moderate animal protein consumption. In this regard, it is not just dietary calcium per se that may cause stone formation, but rather the leaching of bone calcium. Some diseases (eg, distal renal tubular acidosis) which cause a chronically acidic state also decrease urinary citrate levels, which is a potent inhibitor of stone formation, and these patients are prone to frequent stone formation.
Thursday, October 12, 2006
A Glimpse of Paradise
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
Did she really do that?
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
Of CEO's and Manly Vanity
Now, completely off the subject is another article I found interesting. Read it here. Though it took too long for the media to report, I think the phenomenon of male self-image being warped by the media has been in existence just as long as it has been for women. Despite the article's assurance that males worry about body odor much more due to the media, I feel most men are accutely more despaired because of the way these models' bodies look with the six-pack and the well-defined muscles, etc. It makes us want to get off our lazy butts and do something about it...if I could just get the remote out of my hands.
Monday, October 09, 2006
Death of the Internet
Thursday, September 28, 2006
If a tree falls in the forest...
Thursday, September 21, 2006
To blog or not to blog...
Democrat or Republican?
1. Abortion
Democrats: Abortion is a woman’s right and should be legal
Republicans: Abortion should be illegal and restricted by government
Me: Abortion is murder and should only occur in rare cases (Yes, I am not speficially stating in which cases on purpose)
2. Flag Burning
Democrats: Flag burning is political speech and is protected by the Constitution
Republicans: Protect the flag from burning by a constitutional amendment
Me: I agree with the Democrats on this one
3. Gun Control
Democrats: Favor/Gun control is needed
Republicans: Oppose/Gun control is unconstitutional
Me: I tend to side with the republicans in that the people from whom we are trying to keep guns away are the type of people who get them illegally anyway; however, I can see this turning into a comparison of why we should legalize marijuana...
4. Natural Environment
Democrats: Strong regulations are needed to protect the environment
Republicans: Strong environmental laws harm the economy
Me: I can see both sides: on one hand, we need to take care of this world so that future generations can still exist; on the other, I don't think we should live like cavemen to do it...a happy medium needs to exist
5. Race Relations
Democrats: Strong anti-discrimination laws are needed
Republicans: People and businesses can be trusted not to discriminate
Me: I think discrimination is wrong, but so is reverse discrimination. Quotas and laws to ensure minorities are in the workplace don't seem right to me. Let the best person for the job have it, whether it be a man or a woman, someone with yellow or brown skin, a Jew or a Muslim, etc. If the best person for the job cannot be hired because a quota needs to be filled, well then, I think something is screwed up. It is very cliche, but still rings true, "Can't we all just get along?"
6. Minimum Wage
Democrats: Favor/Increase the minimum wage to help workers
Republicans: Oppose/Do not raise the minimum wage because it hurts businesses
Me: I side with republicans on this, not necessarily because it hurts businesses, but because in the long run it raises prices on everything else and helps increase inflation.
7. Healthcare
Democrats: Government should require universal access to healthcare
Republicans: Private insurers are preferable to government mandates
Me: I agree with the democrats here
8. Taxes
Democrats: Increase taxes on the wealthy to pay for public programs
Republicans: Cutting taxes for everyone helps the economy
Me: Agree with the republicans, sort of. Why punish someone for working hard to achieve the American dream? I'm for a flat tax, you make more you pay more, but it's still the same percentage. Obviously the IRS will still be in town and people will still find loopholes and all that, but I feel it would be more equal, which is what everyone (especially democrats) want, isn't it? Liberté, equalité, fraternité.
9. Military
Democrats: Cut military spending; expand veteran’s benefits; act in concert with other nations and/or with support from NATO and the UN
Republicans: Increase military spending; cut veteran’s benefits; don’t be constrained by other nations or by NATO and the UN
Me: Why can't we leave spending where it is and still expand veteran's benefits? Right now our armed forces are stretched thin and could use some help. As for all the vets, they fought and sacrificed for us so that we could sit in our comfortable homes and enjoy watching them on CNN...why can't we give up a little to help them out?
10. Death Penalty
Democrats: Oppose/It is not a deterrent and innocent people are in jeopardy
Republicans: Favor/The death penalty is necessary and effective
Me: I don't necessarily think the death penalty is a huge deterrent, but I do feel it is the right punishment for certain crimes.
11. Gay Rights
Democrats: Favor/Gays rights and marriage are civil rights
Republicans: Oppose/Marriage is a sacred trust between a man and woman
Me: I feel homosexuals are people just like everyone else and deserve rights; however, those rights should not infringe on the rights of others. Supposedly (as noted in an earlier post), this country should be "for the people, of the people, by the people," though it can't accomplish this by siding with the minority. As a moral issue, I don't like the idea of homosexual marriage. I agree with the saying, "hate the sin, love the sinner."
12. Prayer in School
Democrats: Oppose/Violation of the separation between church and state
Republicans: Favor/It is a religious right and our Judeo-Christian heritage
Me: We should be allowed to pray or perform other religious acts where appropriate and without it infringing on the rights of others. Me praying in school is not forcing others to acknowlegde my God as the only true God. I do not force them to pray to my God. All they have to do is sit there. If it's that big of a deal, I will keep my eyes open and not bow my head, then I can just call it free speech.
So, they way I scored it, 70% of my answers favored the republicans on the end result, not necessarily the reasoning behind it.
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
Comfortably Numb
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
Thursday, September 14, 2006
Penance
Wednesday, September 13, 2006
Stem Cell Research
Tuesday, September 12, 2006
Part IV: Immigration
Monday, September 11, 2006
Troisième
Friday, September 08, 2006
Series Part II
Healthcare
Having private insurance companies in the United States appears to have led us down the path of the capitalists, which is to maximize profit for stakeholders at any cost. Primary services such as healthcare should not be in such custody. Everyone deserves to be healthy and should be entitled to the same treatment opportunities, regardless of income. Government run healthcare seems to be working well in Canada and in Europe. Instead of raising taxes, the United States can simply nationalize the private insurance companies and employees pay premiums (though the premium per person will be the same for everyone) to the government healthcare system instead of to a private insurance company.
Wednesday, September 06, 2006
Para pensar
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
Gone
Lost
Sunday, September 03, 2006
Moral Hypocrites
There are many people who believe tolerance is the answer. To a degree tolerance works, but only as a start. It's ok to believe differently than others, it's ok to agree to disagree, but when tolerance is the answer, much is still lacking. Understanding, compassion, empathy, and friendship are not based on tolerance. Neither do they require the same religion, skin color, zip code, income, or hair style. Small children should be our examples of welcoming and being friends to all. They are untouched by social paradigms, inncoent and open, ready to live those famous words, "Can't we all just get along?"
Friday, August 25, 2006
Now for Something Different
Politics
In the United States, the left and the right appear to be very different, though when compared to the global spectrum of politics, it is evident that both democrats and republicans are very near the center. Very extreme political bodies, and even governments, exist on the global level, which make our own political disputes appear mundane and frivolous.
Although we say the majority rule in this country, why is it that the minorities are those who get all the attention and want all changes made for their benefit? Why should 80 percent of the country have to be subject to laws and regulations beneficial to only the other 20 percent?
Thursday, August 24, 2006
Copyright
Wednesday, August 23, 2006
Entry #23-4.84A
After many years of preparation, today I began the first day of my blog. There shall be no ground rules, only a caveat that I may do whatever I wish with this small corner of cyberspace.
To most, this blog is free; however, I say that free is a relative term. Free does not necessarily mean free of monetary cost, though one could argue that an opportunity cost (see economics definition) does have monetary value. Additionally, we try to assign a value to our time spent on certain activities. Would that mean that the value of your time with a certain activity is correlated to the activity's utility (yet another economic term) to the participant?
Let's assume spending time with my family may be priceless for me, though for you, spending time with my family is worthless. Or does the value of our time correspond to our billable rate from work?
As you may have noticed, tangental discussions will be common, if not rampant on this blog. Be prepared for nothing and for everything...you never know what you will get.